Bridges supported by free‐standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five‐year prospective study.
Identifieur interne : 000563 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000562; suivant : 000564Bridges supported by free‐standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five‐year prospective study.
Auteurs : M. Olsson ; J. Gunne ; P. Strand [Suède] ; K. BorgSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1995-06.
Abstract
The clinical question at issue, whether it is possible to combine implants and natural teeth via fixed bridges, is of current interest. The treatment of the subjects of this prospective study was performed between June 1984 and December 1986. This article presents the 5‐year results of the study. The consecutive patient material comprised 23 patients with Applegate Kennedy Class I residual dentition in the mandible and a complete maxillary denture. All 23 patients were provided with implants ad modum Bråemark in each mandibular quadrant. One side was randomized to rehabilitation with fixed bridge between the distal tooth of the residual dentition and an implant; the other side received a free‐standang bridge on2 implants. The fixture survival rate was 88%. No difference was found between the two sides. Bridge stability was 89% for the implant bridges and 91% for the combination bridges. The change in marginal bone level at the implants was small during the 5‐year follow up period (on average 0.1–0.3 mm) and with no difference between the two sides. In conclusion, it was not possible to demonstrate any higher risk of implant or prosthetic failure for tooth‐implant fixed bridges compared with implant‐supported bridges.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060207.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000563
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0BDFEED91523EC1747EAD05E7D7B0CA18AEEE386Curation
No country items
M. Olsson<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnsjukhuset, Skövde,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bridges supported by free‐standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five‐year prospective study.</title><author><name sortKey="Olsson, M" sort="Olsson, M" uniqKey="Olsson M" first="M." last="Olsson">M. Olsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnsjukhuset, Skövde,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, J" sort="Gunne, J" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="J." last="Gunne">J. Gunne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey=" Strand, P" sort=" Strand, P" uniqKey=" Strand P" first="P." last=" Strand">P. Strand</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Linkoping</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borg, K" sort="Borg, K" uniqKey="Borg K" first="K." last="Borg">K. Borg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0BDFEED91523EC1747EAD05E7D7B0CA18AEEE386</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060207.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0BDFEED91523EC1747EAD05E7D7B0CA18AEEE386/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000563</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000563</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000563</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Bridges supported by free‐standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five‐year prospective study.</title><author><name sortKey="Olsson, M" sort="Olsson, M" uniqKey="Olsson M" first="M." last="Olsson">M. Olsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnsjukhuset, Skövde,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, J" sort="Gunne, J" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="J." last="Gunne">J. Gunne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey=" Strand, P" sort=" Strand, P" uniqKey=" Strand P" first="P." last=" Strand">P. Strand</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Linkoping</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borg, K" sort="Borg, K" uniqKey="Borg K" first="K." last="Borg">K. Borg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå,</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="114">114</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="121">121</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-06">1995-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The clinical question at issue, whether it is possible to combine implants and natural teeth via fixed bridges, is of current interest. The treatment of the subjects of this prospective study was performed between June 1984 and December 1986. This article presents the 5‐year results of the study. The consecutive patient material comprised 23 patients with Applegate Kennedy Class I residual dentition in the mandible and a complete maxillary denture. All 23 patients were provided with implants ad modum Bråemark in each mandibular quadrant. One side was randomized to rehabilitation with fixed bridge between the distal tooth of the residual dentition and an implant; the other side received a free‐standang bridge on2 implants. The fixture survival rate was 88%. No difference was found between the two sides. Bridge stability was 89% for the implant bridges and 91% for the combination bridges. The change in marginal bone level at the implants was small during the 5‐year follow up period (on average 0.1–0.3 mm) and with no difference between the two sides. In conclusion, it was not possible to demonstrate any higher risk of implant or prosthetic failure for tooth‐implant fixed bridges compared with implant‐supported bridges.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000563 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000563 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0BDFEED91523EC1747EAD05E7D7B0CA18AEEE386
|texte= Bridges supported by free‐standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five‐year prospective study.
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |